![]() |
| Charm, maybe, but not exactly depth |
And Eric was a step up from the usual Disney prince - two dimensions instead of the standard issue one. Before him the chief qualifications for leading man status was a nice set of shoulders and a horse. This doesn’t necessarily qualify as a flaw in those movies where the prince was deployed more for iconography and myth than for drama. It’s only that I get the feeling that if those guys were in Beauty and the Beast you would find them down the pub singing back up for “Gaston” if you catch my drift.
Beauty and the Beast had and emotional complexity Disney animation hadn't seen before. Belle is a character that could have walked out of the pages of Jane Austen. Beast is raging ball of conflicting emotions, a big furry James Gandolfini. The main obstacle to their romance is internal, not a witch or a curse, although outside forces inevitably play a part. They grapple with things like empathy, self-control, forgiveness, and selflessness. The big breakthrough of Beauty and the Beast was that for the first time, amidst all the magic and adventure, the romance had some psychological truth to it. You could imagine those two characters going on to have a life together after Happily Ever After. What are Cinderella and Prince Charming going to be chatting about after a few years of marriage?
![]() |
| "So...Still into mice?" |
My favorite shot of Beauty and the Beast, which doubles as my favorite moment in the film, is a great example of the depth the Disney artists got out of these characters. I've discussed before my love of Robby Benson's performance as Beast, but this moment belongs entirely to the animators, particularly lead animator for Beast, Glen Keane:
As a young animation nerd I remember reading about the way Keane and his team of animators agonized over getting the expression on Beast's face just right for the first time Belle, and the audience, get a clear look at him. I see a complex mixture of emotions at play here. Embarrassment at his appearance, anger stemming from self-loathing, an attempt to cling to some sort of dignity and a curiosity about this unexpectedly bold girl, what she will do next, and, above all, how she will react to him. It's an impressive achievement.
There are many such beautifully executed character moments in this movie. Another favorite is the breathtaking way Beast's face gradually softens when he decides to spare Gaston's life. But this one is my favorite because of how static it is. The filmmakers trusted that they could leave the focus on Beast and load all the ambiguity and emotion into those eyes.
Perfect.




YES. This was a great post.
ReplyDeleteThanks
ReplyDeletei love the idea of the beast being the prince charming, without really looking like one.
ReplyDeleteBeauty and the Beast isnt the first time disney discusses ideas and emotions that are more mature than the target audience of the film
but as hard as i think about it, when i look back at other disney films that have this quality of maturity without disguise, its never the romance that is portrayed realistically.
the falling in love moment is always, as you said, instantaneous.
anyway, love the post.
and love the thought of big furry gandolfini. isn't he already kinda big and furry? haha
Amir - Honestly, I think the most honest portrayal of romance prior to this was in Lady and the Tramp.
ReplyDeleteLoved your entry. The animation of the eyes, especially Belle's and the Beast's, is outstanding.
ReplyDeleteI also feel that despite Belle being in the middle of the love triangle, this is a boy's fairy tale. He's the one who has to mature while all she has to do is love him, which has its own problems.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite part has to be the argument after the wolves attack, Beasts loss for words is adorable
ReplyDelete