Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Split Second

When Nathaniel asked me to choose a favorite shot from Bonnie and Clyde for his always fun and interesting Hit Me With Your Best Shot series I knew in an instant which shot – or rather which pair of shots – I would choose. Because my choice is from the film’s most famous scene, and I dislike being so damned obvious, I still rewatched the film to be certain, but sure enough nothing came close. Not even the famous shot where the shadows of clouds chase Beatty and Dunaway across a wheat field, portending their doom.

Here are the shots which taken together probably equal less than a second of screen time:


As anyone with even a passing interest in film history could tell you, these spilt second shots immediately precede the movie's climactic massacre, the minute-long, bullet-ridden “dance of death” which stunned and appalled audiences in its day. Arthur Penn knew that the real weight of the sequence was carried in these few frames - in the fact that, though it’s over in a flash, the characters have enough time to fully absorb what is about to happen.

Moments like this are the difference between simply surprising the audience and devastating them, and great directors don't miss them.

Here is a similar blink-and-you'll-miss-it moment from Inglourious Basterds where Tarantino captures the tiny flicker that plays across Fassbender's face as it sinks in that there is no way he is leaving that bar alive.


Lots of imitators can effectively mimic the carnage that follows but Quentin recognizes that without this crucial moment of understanding and resolve the mayhem that follows would be empty style.

Or how about this powerful example from Malcolm X where Spike Lee catches the flash of a wry smile as Malcom's assassins close in and he realizes without fear that the moment he knew to be inevitable has finally arrived.


It’s a tiny oasis of serenity in a scene of extended horror. I can imagine how many a competent filmmaker would not have thought to find it, but Lee did, and the scene would be greatly diminished without it.

Or at the opposite end of the spectrum how about this fleeting image from Frankenheimer’s The Manchurian Candidate which never fails to hit me with a gut punch:


Sure, it would be satisfying to watch Lansbury flop to the floor like a rag doll as her plans turn against her, but not nearly as satisfying as seeing that for the briefest of moments she knew precisely what happened and, more importantly, what was about to happen to her.

There is something to be said for the no warning, bolt-from-the-blue stunner. See The Departed - or better yet, Nashville - for a perfectly executed example of this. But moments like the ones above burn themselves deeper into the memory, or at least they do for me. Great direction is all about making us relate to the events on the screen and one can’t help but project oneself into these moments where the characters can see with total clarity as the walls close in.

Cousins


Saturday, March 24, 2012

Review: The Hunger Games


Gary Ross's The Hunger Games is a film of enormous potential that settles for being a little better than it needs to be. Compared with the cinematic incompetence of the other young adult lit-inspired franchises that have dominated the multiplexes, this film is practically Blade Runner. But held against the enormous potential of its source material it's hard not to feel deflated by the final product.

"Don't color too far outside the lines" was clearly the order of the day i
n the adapting of Suzanne Collins' literary phenomenon. As a result, Hunger Games suffers from a milder case of the Xerox and cram method of adaptation that plagued the Potter franchise. The result is a perfectly competent movie, but material this rich deserves a filmmaker who will make a grab for greatness, even if that risks alienating some potential ticket buyers.



(minor spoilers)

Dysentery and Malaria

Reposted from the fantastic Tumblr On set

1951: A doctor measures Bogie and John Huston’s blood pressure every morning on the set of The African Queen, even though they are the only two members of the team not to be stricken by either dysentery or malaria while filming on location in the Belgian Congo and Uganda.  As Katharine Hepburn notes in her book on this film: “Those two had so much alcohol in their system no germ could possibly survive there.”

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Timeless

When it comes to special effects today’s Avatar is tomorrow’s Captain EO. That’s why films that age best are those like Tourneur’s Cat People, which leave the magical business to the imagination. On the opposite side of the spectrum is stuff like Lon Chaney's Wolfman which requires Herculean effort in order to suspend disbelief. You can practically see the makeup artists diving out of the frame during the cross-dissolves.


This was running through my thoughts yesterday as I thoroughly enjoyed my first viewing of Richard Donner's Ladyhawke (1985). It being a fantasy about lovers who were cursed to transform into animals I was expecting it to have a healthy amount of cringe-inducing mid-Eighties effects, but Donner wisely avoided such moments by suggesting transformations obliquely as in the graceful shot above.

It also didn’t hurt to have legendary Apocalypse Now cinematographer Vittorio Storaro behind the camera shooting the faces of circa 1985 Rutger Hauer and Michelle Pfieffer, but credit to Donner for going for subtlety and resisting the temptation to show everything. History will be kind.

In fact, the fantastical elements of Ladyhawke work so well I couldn’t help but wonder what another brilliant impressionistic director could have done with his lady/bird transformation story if he was forced to go without CGI. I don't know if it would've been an improvement, but I have little doubt it would have been memorable.


(I wish that I could say the film’s score was as timeless as its imagery, but Lord is it horribly Intrusive and dated. It is so bad I suggest eliminating it altogether. Mute the obnoxious soundtrack, turn on the subtitles, play some classical music and enjoy the film’s magnificent visuals and romantic story as a long-lost silent movie)

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Not Shedding Any Tears


I know the standard reaction every time Michael Bay so much as looks in the direction of a movie camera is to blow one's rape whistle and fall to the ground weeping and rending one's garments. This happened in full force when it was announced that not only was Bay attached to a new Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles reboot but, despite the glaring presence of the word "mutant" right there in the title, he was adjusting the origin story to make the turtles aliens. No less than original live action Michaelangelo voice-actor Robbie Rist chimed in right on cue to accuse Bay of "Sodomizing the franchise".

I'm not going to buck the conventional wisdom. Michael Bay is awful. No debate to be had there. His success is an affront to everything great and good about the cinema. But when it comes to him putting down his moneybags long enough to manhandle the TMNT franchise my reaction is this: Fine by me

Seriously, make them goddamn hedgehogs for all I care. Better he muck around with the Ninja Turtles than something, you know, good.

Sacred 

Now, no doubt my nine-year old self would be appalled to read this, but let's be honest, shall we? The Turtles, in every incarnation I've seen, are terrible. I'm talking unambiguously fucking dreadful. The cartoon? A toy commercial, and a bad one at that. The first film? Worthless. Secret of the Ooze? Garbage. The other sequels? Who the hell cares? I've never read the comics, of which many speak highly, but if they still involve pizza-eating, martial arts fighting, sewer-dwelling turtles and their giant rat friend I doubt they would change my opinion favorably.

I say all this as a person who had the toys, the VHS tapes, and both the original Nintendo game and the arcade version. I read the friggin' novelization of the first movie, for Chrissakes. But guess what? I'm in my thirties now and I have no hesitation in admitting that the whole franchise was a pile of crap and the countless hours I blew watching it would have been better spent learning to throw playing cards or play the harmonica or pretty much anything else.

And while I'm at it: Screw This Level

So if the reigning King of Shit wants to take on this shitty franchise I say, "Have at it Buddy!" Knock yourself out. And if nostalgia still has you cursing Bay's name, ask yourself: Would you prefer he turn his attention to, oh say, a live action Iron Giant or a Back to the Future reboot or anything else that actual has some positive legacy for him to ground up and convert to cold hard cash? In know my answer.

"That's a Bingo!"


This week in my Burning Questions column we're talking movie quotes. And not  "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn" or "Here's looking at you kid", but strictly quotes from the last ten years to find the classics in the making. I rank the biggest quotes of the past decade and also nominate a few under-appreciated gems to join their ranks. 


So head over to The Film Experience to nominate your personal favorites, debate the relative merits of "You stay classy, San Diego" vs. "This is Sparta!" or simply to take me to task for leaving "Fetch" off the list.

Friday, March 16, 2012

Orlando Bloom Redux?

Three quick questions regarding this first image that's been circulating of Depp and Hammer as Tonto and The Lone Ranger:


  • The press release from Disney describes Depp's Tonto as a "Spirit Warrior" with no mention of his ethnicity. Is it safe to assume that Gore Verbinski and the Disney folks would like to avoid the questionable casting of whitey white Johnny Depp as a Native American, not to mention the touchiness surrounding the out-dated notion of an Indian sidekick, by re-packaging Tonto as some sort of nondescript ethnicity? (It is worth noting Depp has claimed to have some vague percentage of Cherokee heritage)
  • Obviously it is too early to say with any certainty, but judging by this pic it is fair to ask if Armie Hammer is going to suffer from an Orlando Bloom problem, which is to say Depp will have all the fun, capering and mincing up a storm, while Hammer will play the vanilla, ultimately forgettable straight arrow. Hammer brought a presence and a wry sense of humor to Social Network so he has a fighting chance, but look at that makeup job and that bird. He has his work cut out for him.
  • Does The Lone Ranger means anything - anything - to anyone under the age of 65? Studios have shown time and again they will produce anything at all with a recognizable title (I'm half-expecting a Caligula reboot any day now) but did anyone stop to question whether the name brand was attached to any kind of positive association or if it was just famous for being famous? I'm going to say no, they did not.

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Seconded

I had to highlight this digression from the most recent episode of Paul F. Tompkin's comedic podcast the Pod F. Tompkast, it so perfectly captures a feeling I've had for years but have never quite put into words.

For those who aren't listeners of the show (you're missing out) the opening always consists of a freewheeling stream-of-consciousness monologue improvised by Tompkins. This week the topics ricocheted from his view that Wes Anderson has a perfect track record to Tommy Wiseau's The Room to this off-the-cuff aside about the intentional watching of bad movies:

....The Room, a movie everyone tells you you should see, but you don't need to. Because, ladies and gentlemen, life is short. You are not made of time. I know it's exciting when somebody says, "Oh, this is so awful you have to see it" But - how 'bout this - think of all the movies you don't see when somebody says, "This is so good you have to see it." See those first. Make sure you see all the good sounding movies first. Then you can get around to all the awful sounding movies. You owe it to yourself.
Folks this is the wisdom of middle age talking to you. When I was a young man - "when I wore a younger man's clothes" - oh, I'd go to bad movies on purpose. In the theater. I wasn't even renting them with them on in the background, doing other stuff while they were playing. I would, like, put on clothes and spend money to go see these dumb movies. And I thought it was both a hoot and a holler. Such is the province of the young. (sigh) This wasting of time. 

Nailed it.

I'm not immune to the joys of the so-bad-it's-good movie experience. I recently watched Sucker Punch for exactly this reason and my roommate and I had a grand old time yukking it up. But when friends who have never seen Raging Bull, Lawrence of Arabia or 25th Hour inform that they are gleefully anticipating The Expendables because the addition of Chuck Norris guarantees it will suck even worse than the first, I am baffled. Bad movies are an occasional treat not a way of life. I want to grab them by the lapels and inform them they're frittering their life away, but if I do this then somehow I'm the eccentric one.




You can download the Pod F Tomkast here for free or on iTunes, and I highly recommend you do. It requires no protective layers of irony to be enjoyed. It's so good it's good.

A Separation From Reality

In the US the winning streak of this year’s Oscar winner for Best Foreign Language film rolls on. A Separation remains in the top 20 at the box office and has just topped Almodovar’s The Skin I Live In on track to finish as the year’s most successful foreign language film and the highest grossing Oscar winner since 06’s The Lives of Others.


Yet in Iran it’s another story. After a brief bout of chest-thumping over their victory over the Israeli nominee Iranian authorities have turned on the film and resumed their persecution of Farhadi and the Iranian film community. So what’s the big deal over A Separation? To American eyes this appears to be the equivalent of Congress condemning The Descendants as subversive.

I get ito it in this week's Burning Questions column. Head over to The Film Experience to read all about it.

Monday, March 12, 2012

Early Favorite

The team behind Wes Anderson's Moonrise Kingdom has thrown down the gauntlet. Any film art hoping for the title of movie poster of the year will have to contend with this beauty: 


With so many poster these days assembly line hack jobs it is all the more striking when comes along that actually does the job of increasing my excitement about an upcoming release. This richly detailed image is so good, in fact, it makes me regret listing Moonrise Kingdom so low on my list of the year's most anticipated movies. This poster goes right into the company of these recent stunners:

Saturday, March 10, 2012

Movie First?

Book first or film first? You can only have one pure first experience with a story. The second is unavoidably preoccupied with deviations from the first.


The impending release of The Hunger Games is forcing me to make a choice. I tackle the decision in the current episode of Burning Questions. Go dive into the discussion here and take a side.


I'll Be Taking These Huggies

This week marked the 25th anniversary of the Coens' Raising Arizona. My tribute to the brothers Coen wild younger days can be read at The Film Experience.


For my previous tribute to the Coens' Barton Fink go here.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

2011 - Goodbye To All That


I am beyond ready for the conversation to being about the movies of 2012. I think if I write one more sentence about the various levels of backlash for and against The Artist or how, gosh, it's been a long time since Meryl won an Oscar, I may just go into hibernation until Dark Knight Rises comes out. 

So before I get rolling with 2012 first batch of new movies including The Secret World of Arrietty, Chronicle and Ghost Rider 2 (oh, yes. I've seen it) here is the full coverage of 2011. I really gave it my all this year so check it out if there's any stuff you missed.